Overview
Daniel C. Gunning is a partner in WTK’s Employment Law Group. Dan concentrates his practice on defending employers in discrimination, harassment, and retaliation litigation. He has successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of his employer clients in over a dozen matters. For the rare case that gets past summary judgment, he has obtained two defense verdicts at trial. Dan has extensive experience in both state and federal courts, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Civil Rights Department (formerly DFEH), and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. In addition to litigation, Dan advises employers on ADA/FEHA accommodation and interactive process issues, leave rights, wage and hour, and California Labor Code compliance. He has assisted companies by drafting accommodation procedures, leave policies and notices, employment agreements, separation agreements, arbitration agreements, confidentiality agreements, and employee handbooks.
Representative Matters
- Co-Chaired Jury Trial resulting in 12-0 defense verdict for parcel delivery company on FEHA disability discrimination, failure to accommodate, failure to engage in the interactive process, retaliation, and defamation claims.
- First-Chaired Bench Trial resulting in defense verdict for telecommunications company on de novo appeal of a DLSE meal and rest break claim. Obtained $27,425 in fees and costs on behalf of client.
- Awarded summary judgment and over $125,000 in attorneys’ fees as the prevailing defendant in San Diego Superior Court in a religious discrimination and accommodation case involving a request for a COVID-19 vaccine exemption.
- Awarded summary judgment in Los Angeles Superior Court based on a novel collateral estoppel defense in a retaliation case involving a doctor whose underlying charges were affirmed in an administrative matter.
- Obtained summary judgment in a disability discrimination/failure to accommodate case where the plaintiff was alleging the company illegally terminated him after granting him seven months of leave. The company prevailed, proving the plaintiff was not a qualified individual with a disability at the time of his termination.
- Summary judgment affirmed by Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeal on whistleblower retaliation, FEHA race and disability discrimination, and related claims. Appellate court opinion may be found at http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/D067595.PDF.
- Awarded over $60,000 in fees and costs as prevailing defendant after obtaining summary judgment in whistleblower retaliation, FEHA retaliation, and FEHA associational disability discrimination case. Appellate court opinion affirming summary judgment may be found at http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/D069022.PDF.
- Summary judgment affirmed by 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on a FEHA disability discrimination and failure to accommodate case where the employee alleged she was wrongfully terminated pursuant to the employer’s leave of absence policy. (Markowitz v. UPS, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86245 (C.D. Cal. June 30, 2016))
- Awarded summary judgment in a race and sexual orientation discrimination case where the employee alleged that witnesses called him homophobic slurs.
- Obtained summary judgment in Bakersfield Superior Court on novel judicial estoppel defense in FEHA race and age discrimination case.
- Obtained summary judgment in El Centro Superior Court on FEHA disability discrimination and failure to accommodate case where employee alleged she could have returned to work with accommodation.
- Obtained summary judgment in Fresno County Superior Court on FEHA disability discrimination and failure to accommodate case where employee alleged he should have been returned to work with restrictions.
- Obtained summary judgment in United States District Court, Central District of California in FEHA race and retaliation case where union employee alleged she was wrongfully terminated after complaining of race discrimination and filing union grievances. (Martinez v. UPS, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97134 (C.D. Cal. July 8, 2013))
- Obtained summary judgment in United States District Court, Central District of California in FEHA disability discrimination and failure to accommodate case where employee alleges he was wrongfully terminated while out on a leave of absence.
- Granted dismissal on motion to dismiss based on jurisdictional grounds in consumer class action, resulting in plaintiff dismissing case.
- Negotiated favorable settlements for clients in complex single plaintiff discrimination, harassment, and retaliation cases.
- Represented clients and negotiated favorable settlements in wage and hour and other labor code violations including PAGA and class action claims.
PRO BONO
Mr. Gunning is a member of the firm’s pro bono committee. He has dedicated countless hours to pro bono efforts throughout his career. Some of his pro bono successes include:
- Obtained asylum on behalf of two Afghan refugees fleeing Kabul after the Taliban took over the city
- Obtained and managed a conservatorship for the wife of a severely injured marine
- Awarded a T-Visa for a teenage victim of human trafficking